Legal Opinion
Thorp v. Kepoo
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 6, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-00501 HG-BPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING AS MODIFIED THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND BE GRANTED AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED IN PART
GILLMOR, District Judge.
On July 13, 1999, Defendants removed this action to federal court and one week later filed Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, arguing, inter alia, that this Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. On July 26, 1999, Plaintiff filed his Objection to Defendant’s Motion of Removal to Federal Court (construed as a motion for remand). Both motions were heard by the magistrate judge.
On October 27, 1999,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schneider v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blunt v. Lower Merion School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Falzett v. Pocono Mountain School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Hesling v. Avon Grove School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Rivera v. WhitmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Smeltzer v. HookDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.