Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Loop, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 24, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-5062PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENTZ, District Judge.
Due to the nature of this case and the issues involved, the parties agreed to bifurcate this matter, with the issue of whether the Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act (“LOIA”) 1 applies to defendant, Loop, Inc. (“Loop”), 2 to be heard first, any remaining issues to be tried separately after the Court ruled on the LOIA issue. The parties also agreed to submit the LOIA issue on briefs and depositions to the Court. The last brief was subsequently submitted on May 28, 1991, and the Court took the matter under submission on that date. Therefore, after…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Knapp v. Chevron USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Livings v. Service Truck Lines of Tex., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Vernon J. Copous, Sr., Etc. v. Odeco Oil & Gas Co., Defendant-Third Party v. Building Service & Repair, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Clarkco Contractors, Inc. v. Texas Eastern Gas Pipeline Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Loop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Loop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992