Legal Opinion
Schafer v. Deuel County Board of Commissioners
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 2006No. 23798PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] On March 9, 2005, Norman Schafer and the Deuel County Chapter of Dakota Rural Action (Petitioners) filed two initiative petitions with the Deuel County Auditor. The first petition sought to (1) amend the special exceptions provision of Section 278 of the Deuel County zoning ordinance; (2) add a new Section 508 in which Deuel County residents would be granted the right of referendum on legislative decisions of the board of adjustment, zoning board, or county commissioners; and (8) amend the concentrated animal feeding operations set back requirements of Section…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hunter v. EricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schafer v. DEUEL COUNTY BD. OF COM'RS.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006