Legal Opinion

Bruning v. Bruning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to declare certain deeds to be void on the ground of fraud, and for other relief, plaintiff appeals from an order, referred to as a “ judgment and order ”, granting the motion of defendant Olive R. Bruning to dismiss the complaint on the ground of res judicata, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. The judgment which is claimed to constitute the bar to the action was rendered in an action in which plaintiff sought to establish an agreement on the part of the respondent to reconvey…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Pattison v. PattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Case v. HardenbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. Case v. HardenbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Eastchester v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API