Legal Opinion

Life Cas. Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. Baber

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

This case was tried upon the following stipulation of facts:

“In this cause it is agreed that the Life & Casualty-Insurance Company of Tenessee issued in 1916 to Virginia Baber on her life its policy No. 123707. The said Virginia Baber continued to pay the premiums on said policy up to and including 1930 when the defendant company refused to accept further premiums from her on it at a time when she was not in default and when she was legally entitled to pay said premiums and when it was legally required to accept them. The amount of premiums paid by her on the policy during the above time was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Lovell v. St. Louis Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. McKee v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. GarmanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Helme v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kentucky Home Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Davis v. Amra Grotto M. O. v. P. E. R., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Franklin v. Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. National Life & Accident Ins. v. HamiltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. AMISUB (SFH), Inc. v. Cigna Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API