Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Menage

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 8, 1900No. Nos. 11,952—(39)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by Minneapolis Trust Company, trustee, from an order of tbe district court for Hennepin county, Otis, J., adjusting and settling its account.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

On a former appeal in this action tbe court were of tbe opinion that, in view of tbe fact that tbe application by tbe creditors for a new trial was partly based upon newly-discovered evidence, a new trial should be granted, in order that a further investigation might be made into tbe conduct of tbe trustee with reference to tbe sale of tbe bonds in question. Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Menage, 73 Minn. 441, 76 N. W. 195. Accordingly tbe case was sent back for a new trial., At tbe second trial a vast amount of evidence on tbe part of both sides was introduced. Tbe inquiry took a very wide range,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Minneapolis Trust Co. v. MenageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Board of Law Examiners v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Minneapolis Trust Co. v. MenageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API