Legal Opinion

Walter v. Caffall

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 3, 1939No. 35204PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

An examination of the law and facts o’f this case convinces the court that the judgment appealed from is correct. As both the law and facts are ably discussed and fully reviewed by the trial judge, we have adopted, as our own, his opinion in the case, which is as follows:

“This is a suit by the surviving spouse and heirs of Henry E. Walter, deceased, against Frank B. Caffall, the Caffall Implement Company, Inc., and the Caffall Oil Corporation, to recover the Principal sum of $8,841.67 with interest and attorney’s fees, alleged to be due on the purchase price of a tract of land…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alliance Trust Co. v. StreaterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Cartwright v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  3. Dean v. Hercules IncorporatedSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  4. Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API