Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Holt

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1881No. 1294, Op. Book No. 2, p. 230Published

Appeal from Fannin County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watts, J.

§ 1014. Surety; where he appears as joint maker. It is well settled that one of several joint promisors, not signing as a surety, cannot plead that he is a surety for the purpose of requiring the alleged principal to be jointly or simultaneously sued. [Lewis v. Riggs, 9 Tex. 164; Ritter v. Hamilton, 4 Tex. 325; Ennis & Reynolds v. Crump, 6 Tex. 85.]

§1015. Conclusions of court upon the facts. When the cause is tried by the judge alone, his conclusions upon the facts are entitled to the same weight as the finding of a jury, and where the evidence is conflicting it will not be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey's Adm'r v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Ennis v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Lewis v. RiggsTexas Supreme Court · 1852

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API