Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. White

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 2, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

Based on the evidence and arguments of counsel I have reached the following conclusions with respect to the instructions requested by the executors:

1. The executors, who in respect to certain of the matters here treated are really trustees, are authorized to purchase the annuity contract in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit C to the complaint as modified by the agreement of counsel. (Codicils Nos. 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 22, 26).

2(a). The executors are authorized to purchase a contract in substantially the form annexed to the complaint as Exhibit D, with…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delaware Trust Co. v. DavisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
  2. Edmonds v. WhiteCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
  3. Miller v. Trustees of and/or Public Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API