Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Felicia PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HARRIS CHERNIN, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 6, 1997No. 96-2259Published

1ConcurrenceDiane P. Wood, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority that Felicia Perry’s claim of sex discrimination, in the form of sexual harassment by store manager John Jackson, was correctly denied under the narrowest grounds supported by a majority of the court in our recent en banc decisions in Jansen v. Packaging Corp. of America and Ellerth v. Burlington Industries, 123 F.3d 490 (7th Cir.1997) (“Jansen”). I write simply to explain how I would apply the Jansen standards to Perry’s case, and briefly how the approach I outlined in Jansen would apply.

First, taking the facts brought out at trial in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marcia L. Saxton v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Successor to at & T Bell LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Bonita L. Weiss v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Chicago and Jerry Lawrence in His Individual and Corporate CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Wright v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1138, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,940 Alice Jansen v. Packaging Corporation of America, Kimberly B. Ellerth v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API