Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bartole v. Hughes

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided October 18, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00257Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION MARCUS T. BARTOLE, Plaintiff, v. Cause No. 2:22-CV-257-PPS-JPK SHAY HUGHES, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Marcus T. Bartole, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint against his former attorney, Shay Hughes, both individually and as an “organization/entity.” [DE 1.] “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007).…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API