Legal Opinion

Hauptle v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

This appeal is from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County affirming the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which denied appellant benefits for an accident allegedly sustained by her husband, who is now deceased.1 The decision of the board and the order of the court below were based on findings that there had been no accident and that there *294had been no notice of an accident given to the employer within 120 days of the date on which appellant claims the accident had occurred, as required by the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, as amended,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Symons v. National Electric Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Mohler v. COOKSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Erwin v. L. & H. CONSTRUCTION CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. McCafferty v. Masten Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Dixon v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Williams v. Bonair Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API