Legal Opinion

Bond v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1917No. S. F. No. 8120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On the conclusion of the oral argument, the following opinion was rendered: The court is of the opinion that the case is not distinguishable from Huerstal v. Muir, 62 Cal. 479, that the amendment to section 1210 of the Code of Civil Procedure has not changed the law in the respect suggested, and does not grant or confer any right of appeal in such a matter, that under these circumstances Huerstal v. Muir, 62 Cal. 479, controls, and the portion of the order complained of in this proceeding should be annulled.

It is so ordered.

Sloss, J., Melvin, J., and Lawlor, J., dissented.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huerstal v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928