Raia v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, Judge.
On appeal from his convictions for second degree murder and use of a firearm in the commission of murder, Louis W. Raia contends that the trial court violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution by permitting a police investigator to read to the jury a transcript of a third party’s statement. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom. Higginbotham v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lilly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Bass v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Randolph v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- McDonnough v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Rankins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.