Davis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BELCHER, Judge.
The offense is robbery; the punishment, fifteen years.
Ground of error No. 1 is that the court permitted the state to connect the appellant with extraneous offenses during the presentation of the state’s case in chief.
Officer Brumley of the El Dorado Arkansas Police Department testified that he arrested the appellant in El Dorado. For reversal appellant relies upon the following testimony of Officer Brumley given during his direct examination by the state:
“Q What final disposition did you make of the prisoners?
“A We arrested them.
“Q After they were arrested?
“A Well, we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Durham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Lacefield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Pearson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Bayless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.