Legal Opinion

In re Becker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1989No. 82S00-8709-DI-815PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Respondent and the Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission have tendered for this Court's approval a statement of circumstances and conditional agreement for discipline. The agreement stems from a verified complaint alleging that the Respondent violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(6), 5-105(A), (B) and (C), 6-101(A)(8) and 7-101(A)(2) by representing clients with conflicting interests and failing to file a pleading as requested by his client.

Upon review of the agreement, we find that it should be approved. Accordingly, we find that the Respondent, Emil J. Becker, Jr., is a member of the Bar…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API