In re Becker
Indiana Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Respondent and the Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission have tendered for this Court's approval a statement of circumstances and conditional agreement for discipline. The agreement stems from a verified complaint alleging that the Respondent violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(6), 5-105(A), (B) and (C), 6-101(A)(8) and 7-101(A)(2) by representing clients with conflicting interests and failing to file a pleading as requested by his client.
Upon review of the agreement, we find that it should be approved. Accordingly, we find that the Respondent, Emil J. Becker, Jr., is a member of the Bar…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993