Wight v. Rose

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries received in an automobile accident, which occurred July 14,1923, at Market and Forty-second streets, in the city of Louisville. A trial resulted in a judgment and verdict for $600.00 for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The chief complaint is that the first and second instructions given are contradictory, and, therefore, considered as a whole, are necessarily erroneous and prejudicial.

The first instruction is not criticised. It defines defendant’s duties in the operation of his ■ automobile, and…