Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Friedman Appeal of Frank.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 1928No. Appeal 73PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Appellants, Harry Frank and Meyer Letwin, together with Samuel Friedman and Simon Rosenthal, were indicted for conspiracy to commit arson and to defraud certain insurance companies. At the trial before Judge Grape of Armstrong County, specially presiding, Friedman and Rosenthal entered pleas of guilty. Appellant's were tried and the jury retired to deliberate about two o’clock on Saturday afternoon, December 17, 1927. After they had deliberated for about two hours, they communicated with Judge Graff that they were hopelessly deadlocked and could not agree; that the jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CraigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Commonwealth v. GaborSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Commonwealth v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. McCreary v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. Lynch v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. BeidermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. OISTERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Com. of Pa. v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API