Legal Opinion

Sheeley v. C.R.C.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2001No. 20000286PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶1] C.A.M.C. (“Connie”)1 appeals from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights to C.R.C. (“Courtney”), age 7. We conclude the evidence is clear and convincing that Courtney is a deprived child; the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied; and Courtney is suffering, or will probably suffer, serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm from the deprivation if Connie’s parental rights are not terminated. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 1994, Courtney was born to Connie and S.B. (“Steve”), who were never married. Later that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Interest of LFNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Interest of AsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sheeley v. S.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Interest of W.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re DFGNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Adoption of SrfNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Balliet v. S.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re DQNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. DuboisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Interest of J.M.P.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API