Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1981No. 43520Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Movant-defendant Terry L. Bailey appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his Rule 27.26 motion.

Defendant had entered pleas of guilty to burglary and stealing and been sentenced to concurrent 3 and 5 year prison terms.

Here, defendant’s only point relied on is that the trial court erred in summarily denying his motion to vacate on the ground the motion “alleged factual circumstances, which if believed entitled him to relief, on the grounds his counsel was ineffective”.

Rule 84.04(d) requires briefed points relied on to concisely specify the rulings to be reviewed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Plant v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Harmon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API