Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 2009No. Docket Nos. 54825, 54879, 55072. (Calendar Nos. 1-3, 9-11)Published

1DissentColeman, J.

These three cases were remanded to the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) for further proceedings and a clear statement in each case of the underlying reasons for the subsequent findings, Deziel v Difco Laboratories, Inc, 394 Mich 466; 232 NW2d 146 (1975). The WCAB has returned the cases with findings as ordered.

Our focus is upon the standards or criteria to be used in determining whether the employer was statutorily responsible for the employees’ mental disorder. In each case the employee had "imagined/perceived/hallucinated”1 a disabling injury.

The Michigan worker’s disability act…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whetro v. AwkermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Redfern v. Sparks-Withington Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Vanderbee v. Knape & Vogt Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API