Legal Opinion
San Jacinto Rice Co. v. Hamman
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1923No. 338-3708PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of First Supreme Judicial District. Suit by George Hamman against the Sam Jacinto Rice Company and others. Judgment for the plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, and defendants bring error, and! judgments of the district court and of the Court of Civil Appeals reversed, and remanded to the district court for entry of judgment in accordance with agreement.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
On the day when above cause was to be submitted counsel representing all interested'parties filed in our court an agreement in the following language, to wit:
“Now come all parties, plaintiffs in error and defendants in error, and make known to the court that Charlotte J. Brooke and husband, E. H. Brooke, have each departed this life since writ of error was granted by the Supreme Court in this cause; that Mrs. E. M. Brooke has surviving her two minor children, named Doratha Juaneta Brooke and Virginia Rose Brooke, ages áix and three, respectively; and that Charles C. Hon, one of the defendants…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Mickelson v. MickelsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Bering Mfg. Co. v. W. T. Carter & Bro.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Southwestern Settlement & Development Co. v. Village Mills Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Elliott v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Redden v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.