Legal Opinion
Langsam-Borenstein Partnership v. NOC Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 5, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 90-2675PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
Third-party defendants move to quash service of the third-party complaint1 and to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). They also move to quash service of trial and deposition subpoenas.
This breach of contract action arose upon the following facts: Langsam-Borenstein Partnership is a financial lender having its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Langsam-Borenstein claimed that NOC failed to pay its assign- or, Bulk Systems, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, for oil hauling and storage services in the amount…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- PROSERV REMOVAL, INC. v. CRYSTEEL MANUFACTURING, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Rosencrans v. State Correctional Institution at DallasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025