Legal Opinion
In re Aliyah Careema D.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 18, 2011PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The finding that respondent violated the terms of the suspended judgment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see e.g. Matter of Kendra C.R. [Charles R.], 68 AD3d 467 [2009], lv dismissed and denied 14 NY3d 870 [2010]). Respondent was required, inter alia, to submit to random drug testing and remain free of illicit substances, maintain regular and consistent supervised visitation, and obtain and maintain a source of income and suitable housing for herself and the child. Shortly after the suspended judgment was granted, respondent was convicted of criminal sale of a controlled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Anthony M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re Kendra C.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re David J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Davontay Peter H. v. Makeba H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Madisynn W. (Esprit L.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- In re Serenity A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Serenity A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re Steven A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.