Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Lynch
District Court, D. Minnesota
At Law. Action by the Great Northern Railway Company against E. J. Lynch, Collector of Internal Revenue.
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, District Judge.
The above action came on regularly for trial on the 11th day of March, 1918, each party appearing by its respective counsel. Prom the admissions and stipulations of the parties then and there made and filed, and from the pleadings of the parties, the court finds as follows:
Findings of Fact.(1) That plaintiff is a corporation duly formed and existing under the laws of the state of Minnesota, and has a principal office at St. Paul, in Ramsey county, in said state.(2) That E. J. Lynch is, and was on all of the dates hereinafter mentioned, collector of internal revenue for…
2Cited by11 opinions
- West Seattle Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
- Loose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Helvering v. Jane Holding CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- B. F. Avery & Sons, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Simmons Gin Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.