Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davidor

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1946No. 36149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

We have given earnest consideration to the suggestion of error. We are of the opinion that our original decision was correct, and that the suggestion of error should he, and it is, overruled. However, some of the pronouncements in the original opinion were not necessary to a decision of the case at bar, and, therefore, that opinion is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

On July 12, 1943, appellant, W. M. Davis (whom we will hereafter call Bill Davis), executed to appellee Robert H. Davidor an oil and gas lease and a mineral deed to one-half the minerals on and in forty acres…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meier v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Holbrook v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Meier v. ThiemannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Jones v. LamensdorfMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hinds v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re CobbinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999
  3. Stinson v. Williamson (In re Williamson)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Cobbins v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Bolivar County, Mississippi v. Wal-Mart Super CenterMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API