Legal Opinion

Flesner v. Youngs Development Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1991No. 71242PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The issue before the court is whether plaintiffs are allowed more than one refiling of an action if the refilings fall within the applicable statute of limitations pursuant to section 13—217 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 110, par. 13—217). We interpret the language of section 13—217 as providing for one and only one refiling regardless of whether the applicable statute of limitations has expired.

Section 13 — 217 provides as follows:

“In the actions specified in Article XIII of this Act or any other act or contract where the time for commencing an action is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Relaford v. KyawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Howard v. FrancisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Walicek v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Carr v. TilleryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Timberlake v. Illini HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ko v. Eljer Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Steinberg v. DunsethAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Kathleen Evans, as Conservator of Jessica Evans, a Protected Person v. Lederle Laboratories, Link Clinic, and O. SharmaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API