Legal Opinion

Marlatt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1984No. 46995PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Presiding Judge.

Karen Marlatt appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 27.26 motion attacking a ten-year sentence she received after pleading guilty to the charge of selling a controlled substance in violation of § 195.020, RSMo 1978. 1 We affirm.

On May 19, 1980, a jury found appellant guilty of selling a controlled substance, marijuana, and recommended a fifteen-year sentence. On July 22, 1980, prior to sentencing on the jury verdict, appellant pleaded guilty to a second similar charge and was sentenced by the court to serve ten years. Three days later she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McMahon v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. Beattie v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. McCall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Eakins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Scruggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API