Marlatt v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Presiding Judge.
Karen Marlatt appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 27.26 motion attacking a ten-year sentence she received after pleading guilty to the charge of selling a controlled substance in violation of § 195.020, RSMo 1978. 1 We affirm.
On May 19, 1980, a jury found appellant guilty of selling a controlled substance, marijuana, and recommended a fifteen-year sentence. On July 22, 1980, prior to sentencing on the jury verdict, appellant pleaded guilty to a second similar charge and was sentenced by the court to serve ten years. Three days later she…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McMahon v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Beattie v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- McCall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Eakins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Scruggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.