Legal Opinion
Luster v. Hutchens
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1932No. Nos. 9429-9431PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
These are three separate actions for damages on account of breach of contract brought against the executors of the estate of Frank C. Hermann by Gilruth, by Gillette, and by Hutchens. The cases were consolidated for trial and judgments entered in favor of each plaintiff on the verdict of a jury. From such judgments these appeals are brought.
In 1932, the Gillette Rubber Company, a Wisconsin corporation, located at Eau Claire, went into receivership, Mr. Hermann being one of the receivers. In 1935, there was a reorganization worked out by the creditors’ committee and Mr.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. International Contracting Co. v. LamontSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Housekeeper Pub. Co. v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Parish v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Consumers' Cotton-Oil Co. v. AshburnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1897
- McCabe Const. Co. v. Utah Const. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Metcalf v. Security International Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Martin v. LusterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936