State v. Sexton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
“Once again, we must reconcile anomalies and ambiguities that inhere in the Code of Criminal Justice ... occasioned by the Legislature’s selective inclusion and omission of provisions of its conceptual source, the Model Penal Code (MPC).” Richardson v. Nickolopoulos, 110 N.J. 241, 242, 540 A.2d 1246 (1988).
The “anomalies and ambiguities” presented in this appeal concern the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2C:2-4, governing the so-called mistake-of-fact defense to a criminal charge. Specifically, the question is how to explain to the jury the effect of a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. ConcepcionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. BreakironSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- State v. HarmonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. SavageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- State v. JenewiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. BurrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Phillips v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.