Legal Opinion
Hudson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided August 30, 2006No. 10-05-00172-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELIPE REYNA, Justice.
After the trial court denied Jimmie Dewayne Hudson’s suppression motion, Hudson pleaded nolo contendere to burglary of a vehicle. Pursuant to a plea bargain, the court sentenced Hudson to ten months’ confinement. Hudson contends in three points that the court abused its discretion by: (1) denying his suppression motion because his interrogation without a warrant, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion constitutes an unlawful seizure; (2) denying his suppression motion because his DNA was obtained from a Dr. Pepper can which had been unlawfully seized; and (3)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carmouche v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Pollard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Artis Lee Pollard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2012
- Christi Beth Perrin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Christopher Paul Wyss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.