Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Shannon v. City of Forsyth

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1983No. 83-047PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

Appellants (the Shannons) filed a petition with the City of Forsyth seeking a waiver to locate a mobile home on a lot in a “Residential A” zoning district which excludes mobile homes. After the City Council denied their petition, the Shannons filed a petition for writ of review in the District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District, Rosebud County. The District Court affirmed the decision of the City Council and this appeal followed.

The City of Forsyth is divided into four zoning districts: Residential A, Residential B, Commercial C, and Industrial D. Mobile homes are excluded from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Freeman v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Janas v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. State v. KastenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cary v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hornstein v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Egan Slough v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Petition to Transfer TerritoryMontana Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API