Legal Opinion

State v. Goodlow

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1992No. Nos. 63597 through 63599PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant state of Ohio appeals, on the accelerated docket, the granting by the trial court of defendants-appellees Rose Goodlow, Marion Goodlow and Vanessa Cunningham’s motion to suppress. 1 For the reasons adduced below, we affirm.

A review of the hearing on the motion to suppress indicates that the only-witness to testify at the hearing was Cleveland Police Patrolman Michael Tankersley, who testified on behalf of the state as follows: (1) on the date of the hearing, April 15, 1992, he had been with the force for two years; (2) the date of the arrests was November 12, 1991; (3) he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Frank Gunnar WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. United States v. Frank Gunnar WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. People v. KunathAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API