Legal Opinion

Heath v. Seattle Taxicab Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1913No. 10465PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered March 16, 1912, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $4,500, for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian struck by a taxicab.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries, claimed to have been suffered by the plaintiff by being struck by a taxicab belonging to the defendant, through the negligence of defendant’s driver. The substance of the plaintiff’s testimony was as follows: On February 11, 1911, the plaintiff was acting as a police officer of the city of Seattle. His hours were from 8 p. m. until 4 a. m., and his territory included Fremont, a suburb of Seattle. About S o’clock in the morning of . that day, he saw a taxicab approaching Fremont from the south on Westlake avenue at a very high rate of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Althorf v. . WolfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Sherlock v. AllingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Harding v. Town of TownsendSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  4. Buell v. BallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  5. Ross v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Shea v. RettieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Johnson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Johnson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ciminski v. SCI CORPORATIONWashington Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API