Legal Opinion

Grawunder v. Gotoskey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 24, 1918No. 7583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Austin County; Norman G. Kittrell, Special Judge. Suit by Joe Gotoskey against H. Grawun-der. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, C. J.

This suit, brought in the form of an action of trespass to try title, involves only a question of boundary. The suit was brought by appellee against appellant. After a general description of plaintiff’s land, the petition describes and locates the east boundary line thereof, which is the line in dispute, as follows:

“The third above described line begins in the center of a lane in the prairie, which lane is located between the tracts of land of H. Gra-wunder, defendant, and Joe Gotoskey, plain tiff, between the north corner of Grawunder and the east corner of Gotoskey, and runs thence south 25…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lecomte v. ToudouzeTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cooper v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Coleman v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Stephens v. AdairTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Ware v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Baten v. Kirby Lumber CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. Shelor v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Roberts v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Gulf Oil Corporation v. TimmsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API