State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Langan
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Smith, J. (dissenting).
I would affirm the order of the Appellate Division.
As a general matter, it is true that whether a particular event is an “accident” should be viewed from the point of view of the insured. The insured here was Spicehandler, the event was an accident from his point of view, and his estate was therefore properly allowed to recover under the so-called PIP and Coverage S endorsements.
But uninsured/underinsured motorists (UM) coverage is different. Its purpose is to protect an insured who is injured by a tortfeasor without liability insurance—a purpose accomplished by putting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Town of Massena v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- McCarthy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Wheeler v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- McCarthy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.