Legal Opinion
State v. Grinstead
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 2011No. Nos. CA2010-06-150, CA2010-07-163, CA2010-07-164, CA2010-07165, CA2010-07-166, CA2010-07-167 and CA2010-07-180PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ringland, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, John Grinstead, Larry Lough, and Tri E Technologies, L.L.C., appeal from their convictions in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons outlined below, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On May 20, 2009, the Butler County Grand Jury returned an indictment against Tri E, a defunct company involved in a variety of industrial processes that leased office and warehouse space located at 100 Security Drive, Fairfield, Butler County, Ohio, and its former president, Grinstead, and former CEO, Lough, charging them with, among other things, failing to prepare a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- State v. DinkaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. KaufholdOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. BurnsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RoperOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.