Legal Opinion
In re Pacat Finance Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 22, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
The various claims passed upon by the special master will be disposed of in the order in which he treated them:
Claim of National Shawmut Bank of Boston:
For the reasons specified by the .master in dealing with the reclamation of Shawmut, I shall confirm the report thereon. As was said by Mr. Chief Justice Hiscock in Equitable Trust Co. v. Keene, 232 N. Y. 290, 133 N. E. 894, 19 A. L. R. 1137:
“Tbe fact that the [exchange] transaction is to be effectuated by cable is of course immaterial; the principles defining the nature of the transaction are not any different than they…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re BolognesiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Equitable Trust Co. v. . KeeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- In re PerpallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- In re JarmulowskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maxwell Communication Corp. v. National Westminster Bank Plc (In Re Maxwell Communication Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- In Re Tate-Jones & Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- In re Pacat Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Jordahl v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932