Legal Opinion
David Leinoff, Inc. v. 208 West 29th Street Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 30, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered July 3, 1996, denying the plaintiffs motion to restore the action to the trial calendar and to strike the defendant’s motion for discovery and inspection, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of striking the demands for Mr. Leinoff s personal tax records for 1993 and thereafter, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order, same court (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered March 10, 1997, conditionally granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint unless the plaintiff fully complied with the July 3,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gordon v. GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Leon Sylvester, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Vega v. 265 West 37 Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lord Day & Lord v. Socialist Republic of VietnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Dore v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Manzella v. Provident Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Sachs v. AdeliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Four Aces Jewelry Corp. v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.