Bullett v. Worthington
High Court of Chancery of Maryland
[The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Chancellor.]
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
After having listened, with great attention, to a very full and able discussion at the bar of the several questions of law and of fact which arise in this case, I have bestowed upon them the most careful consideration of which I am capable.
The cause is an important one, not only with reference to the amount of property involved in the decision, but the questions to be decided give additional interest to it, and I have, therefore, omitted no examination, and spared no pains to arrive at a correct conclusion, according to the best of my judgment.
The object of the bill is to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reade v. LivingstonNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
- Parkhurst v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Worthington v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
- Mercer v. WalmsleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1820
- Boteler v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1835
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilmer v. PlacideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Turner v. Hudson Cement & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Lucas v. Maryland Drydock Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Annin v. AnninNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1873
- Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.