Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Corrigan v. Great Northern-Chan Restaurant, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1982No. 43499PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

Plaintiff-relator’s complaint in quo warranto seeks to oust certain purported officers and directors of designated corporations from holding those positions or exercising those functions. Because the corporations involved are not created by the authority of this state, we must grant defendant’s motion to dismiss.

This court’s authority in quo warran-to proceedings is limited by the statutory scope of such actions. State, ex rel. Price, v. Columbus, Delaware & Marion Elec. Co. (1922), 104 Ohio St. 120, 125. Governing statutes provide:

R.C. 2733.01:

“A civil action in quo warranto may be brought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. State Ex Rel. Bricker v. Buhl Optical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Relief Assn. v. Assur. Soc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Dayton Bldg & Savings Ass'n v. KroegerOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Salim v. Ayed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Global Launch, Inc. v. Wisehart, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2010
  3. Bracha Found. v. Warren Steel Holdings, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Salim v. Ayed (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API