Legal Opinion

Sisk v. L. W. Eaton Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1956No. 4235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

The District Court sustained an exception of no cause of action to this tort suit on the ground that plaintiff’s immediate employer was a subcontractor of defendant L. W. Eaton Co., Inc., and that plaintiff’s sole remedy therefore was for workmen’s compensation. Eaton’s liability insurer is a codefendant.

Plaintiff Sisk and a co-employee, Tidwell (plaintiff in a companion suit, Tidwell v. L. W. Eaton Co., La.App., 89 So.2d 424) were permanently crippled while working for Acoustics & Specialities, a New Orleans firm. They were paid full workmen’s compensation by their employer’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  2. Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Trumbull Cliffs Furnace Co. v. ShachovskyOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Anderson v. Sanderson & PorterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. Clark v. Monarch Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bordelon v. Great American Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Bethlehem Steel Company v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Richard v. National Surety CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API