Legal Opinion
Viguerie v. Mathes
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1929No. 10,665PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.
This is a suit by a real estate broker for a commission in the sum of $916.99. The defendant denied liability and reconvened, asking judgment for $128.20. There was judgment for plaintiff on the main demand, and for the defendant in reconvention, both as prayed for. The defendant, Mathes, has appealed, and the plaintiff Viguerie has answered the appeal, seeking to have the judgment in reconvention amended by reducing the amount allowed.
Both plaintiff and defendant are réal estate agents, and at the time when the transaction, out of which this suit arose, occurred, the defendant Mathes was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bullis Thomas v. CalvertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Walsh v. GrantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Freeman & Freeman v. Torre Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Harvey v. WintersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Fellman v. EcuyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corbitt v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Veters v. KrushevskiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Foulks v. RichardsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Zollinger v. GustLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hamberlin v. BourgeoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.