Legal Opinion

L. N. Dantzler Lumber Co. v. Churchill

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1905No. 1,436PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi.

1Opinion of the Court

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

This is a libel for demurrage claimed because the charterers of the barkentine Hornet did not furnish *561cargo for loading within the loading days stipulated in the charter party. The charter party provides:

“It is agreed.that the lay days for loading and discharging shall be as follows, (if not sooner dispatch), commencing from the time the captain reports his vessel ready to receive or discharge cargo.
“Lay days not to commence before Friday, Dec. 18th, 1903. Loading and discharging with all possible dispatch, bnt not less than 25 M. ft. daily loading and discharging…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fukaya Trading Company, SA v. Eastern Marine Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
  2. Aktieselskabet Dampskibselskabet Af 1912 v. 20,029 Bags of SugarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  3. Anderson v. J. J. Moore & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  4. United States v. Sugarland IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  5. United States v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API