Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Canivez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 21, 1935No. 13,619PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

On January 14, 1933, Arthur Canivez, to whom reference is hereinafter made as claimant, sustained a personal injury as the proximate result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with the Rocky Mountain Fuel Company which, with its insurance carrier, w!e will designate as respondents. The injury consisted of a hernia, on the right side at or near the operative scar of a previous hernia sustained in 1931. Claim was made before the Industrial Commission of Colorado, one of the defendants in error, to which we will refer as the commission. After hearings, compensation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherratt v. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  2. Hayden Bros. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Morrison v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Century Indemnity Co. v. KlipfelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  4. Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. SherrattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  5. Kokel v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API