In re Ackerman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with eleven allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained Charges One, Two and Four through Eleven. The Grievance Committee moves to confirm the Special Referee’s report with respect to the 10 charges which were sustained and to disaffirm with respect to Charge Three, which was not sustained. The respondent cross-moves to disaffirm the Special Referee’s report with respect to Charges Two, Four, Five, Six, Seven, Nine and Eleven and to order the matter sealed with respect to evidence tendered on…
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Frank v. PepeNew York Supreme Court · 2000