Legal Opinion
In Re Woolsey
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah
Decided October 8, 2010No. 10-25893PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
THURMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matter before the Court is the confirmation of the Debtors’ Chapter 13 Amended Plan (“Plan”). Hearings were conducted on the Plan on July 20, 2010, and August 30, 2010, in which the Court listened to argument by David Cook for Kenneth and Stephanie Woolsey (“Debtors”) and by Jocelyn Rick for the Chapter 13 Trustee, Kevin Anderson (“Trustee”). The primary issue to be resolved in this confirmation proceeding is whether the Plan must contain language acknowledging the continuance of a wholly unsecured lien on the Debtors’ primary residence until…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Stephen J. McdonaldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- In Re Sieglinde M. Zimmer, Debtor, Sieglinde M. Zimmer v. Psb Lending CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lam v. Investors Thrift (In Re Lam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Robert Ray Harrison and Frankey Daylene Harrison, Debtors. Agricredit Corporation v. Robert Ray Harrison and Frankey Daylene HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lindskog v. M & I Bank FSB (In Re Lindskog)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
- In re PetersenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2016
- Richins v. Bank of America Home Loans (In Re Richins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2012