Legal Opinion

Kent v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1938No. 26684PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

1. An agreement in accord and satisfaction of a note is not a satisfaction of the debt unless it is so expressly agreed between the parties, or the new promise is founded on a new consideration, or unless the agreement in accord and satisfaction has been executed. Code, § 20-1201; Farkas v. Third National Bank, 133 Ga. 755 (66 S. E. 926, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 496); Foy-Adams Co. v. Smith, 19 Ga. App. 172 (91 S. E. 242). An agreement between a debtor and a creditor by which the debt, which is secured by a deed to real estate, is to be paid in a certain designated number of monthly instalments,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jester v. Bainbridge State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Farkas v. Third National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Redman v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Horne v. RodgersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. Kingston Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burch v. RaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Motor Contract Co. v. WigingtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Mitchell v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Ponce De Leon Properties, Inc. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API