Cronovich v. Dunn
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
COHN, District Judge.
I
A
Defendants, with the exception of defendant Rashid, have moved for a certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) to enable them to take an interlocutory appeal from parts of my order of September 6, 1983 denying a number of motions filed June 28, 1983. In particular defendants desire certification of the order denying:
1. The motion to dismiss plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint on the grounds that Title VII’s policy making exception, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(f), applies by implication to bar plaintiff’s claim of sex discrimination and retaliation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Helen S. Cardwell, Administratrix of the Estate of Winfred M. Cardwell, Deceased v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Keith Forsyth v. Richard G. Kleindienst, John N. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Allen v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cynthia A. Forrester v. Judge Howard Lee WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Harriett L. McMillan v. Gerald SvetanoffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States ex rel. Elliott v. Brickman Group Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Laskowski v. MearsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
- Stubblefield v. City of Jackson, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.