Levy v. Annenberg

The first separate defense in the amended answer, which is attacked herein, does not comply with the order under which the amended answer was served and is not in accord with the decisions of this court and the cases cited.

The libelous general charges are: “A great deal of lingelizing was being done regularly by Max Annenberg and Charlie Levy some of which has not been mentioned by the Rev. Williams; ” “ they made it a practice to visit roulette gambling places, and if they won, they took their winnings 100% and if they lost, they settled on the basis of 20% * * * to trim the trimmers; ” “…